Page 13 - For the purpose of this essay when I refer to ‘spirit’ ‘devine’ or ‘spirituality’ I am referring
P. 13

1. Do you believe that there is a spiritual dimension (such as divine influence,
           connecting to something within ourselves but also greater than ourselves) to creating
           your art?


           The aim  of the artist in  making art is  usually to impact in some  way beyond the
           physical. That is not to deny that there must be a physical impact on the viewer, for
           example that achieved in the work of say Bridget Riley on the optics and the impact of
           colour in general. Nevertheless, it is the intention of the artist to move/stir the viewer
           some way beyond those physical reactions, through the use of the physical.

           In the broadest sense of definition of the Spiritual, there is little doubt that it plays a
           significant part in the creation of work, and I believe I experience some vital force,
           either of Self or of Other at certain stages in the making of work. Because the act of
           painting is a physical thing, this is expressed in a very physical way, in the flick of the
           brush and impulsive addition of the unexpected, indeed those choices made with no
           base in rational thought. While subject wise, I respond to both the material  and the
           immaterial, (I regularly revisit aspects of the physicality of painting in my objectives ) I
           consider  that I am  closest to  achieving good work, when I am  working beyond the
           physical, and indeed beyond the intellectual, which I don’t believe to equate with the
           Spiritual.  Expressed in  a physical way,  painting at that stage seems to be driven  by
           some other force or compulsion. This experience tends to present at a later part in the
           exploration of the subject.

           2. Do you believe great art can be created without being open to this influence? Is it a
           necessary part of the creative process for you?

           It is difficult to summarise, or be definitive about all ‘great art’, and whether great art
           can be created without being open to the influence of the Spiritual. I do think that the
           creative urge in itself is a basic fundamental urge,  which could be described as
           ‘spiritual’.  We  do  not  always  understand  the  why,  but  can  be  described  as  a
           compulsion, and it does seem to fulfil a huge need.
           In reading what good artists write, and in listening to what they have to say with regard
           to their working process, it seems to me that in general, those processes do not appear
           to be that different to my own, and so I will refer to what I find in relation to my own
           work. Generally what we see in the work of others reflects our own experiences.
           Exploring subject matter beyond that which I can predict, which I believe to be in the
           realms of the ‘Spiritual’, is part of where I hope to go in the  making of  work.
           Furthermore, I am regularly struck by the way threads of connection go through what I
           do as an artist. Sometimes these are not connections I see instantly, and it is frequently
           in looking retrospectively at work done that one sees them.

           What is great art? How do I define it?
           Great visual art, for me, has to include a strong visual dimension. While I look for
           aspects of the physical – shapes, surface, texture, composition - it is still some
           unassailable quality



                                                            13
   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18