Page 36 - Winter Issue
P. 36

Your work often involves reimagining historic forms, like Tudor portraits and traditional Chinese vessels.
             What draws you to these particular historical and cultural references?
             I first encountered portraits from the Tudor era at the Tate Britain Museum, and they left a profound impression on me.
             Specifically, the figures in these Tudor portraits often appear stiff, with standardized expressions and even similar facial
             features. However, their clothing is intricate, ornate, and highly decorative, giving me the impression that the people in
             the paintings resemble objects.
             Regarding traditional Chinese vessels, I believe that my extensive museum visits, combined with the critical thinking skills
             I  developed  at  UAL,  have  given  me  a  renewed  understanding  of  Chinese  history  and  culture.  My  works  reflect  my
             reverence for and appreciation of classical Chinese art. I aim to recreate these traditional themes while offering a fresh
             perspective.
             In  your  series  based  on  Tudor-era  female  portraits,  you  humorously  objectify  the  women  depicted  by
             transforming their garments into vessels. How do you think humor changes the viewer's perception of
             gender roles in your work?
             After researching and thinking about those paintings, I formed an interesting opinion. Specifically, the paintings reflect
             those noblewomen of that era used clothing and jewelry to display wealth and status, suggesting that personal choices
             within this social trend might involve a kind of 'self-objectification.' Thus, I transform these 2D images into 3D objects,
             which is also a form of 'objectification.' However, I don’t intend for the work to come across as harsh criticism; rather, I
             want viewers to see and reflect on this phenomenon. That’s why I chose a subversive—or even humorous—approach to
             present these figures. I hope this will make people more open to engaging with the questions raised by the work.
             You’ve noted that your work challenges the hierarchy between “fine art” and “decorative art.” How does
             this idea influence your creative process and the way you present your ceramic pieces?
             Yes, essentially, I want to make the work more engaging. Traditionally, painting is considered fine art, while vases are
             viewed as decorative art. Therefore, in the creative process, I chose not to transform the portraits into busts; instead, I
             omitted the figures' bodies, turning them into 'vases,' which are characterized by being hollow. This further emphasizes
             the concept of ‘objectification.’
             How does your background in Chinese ceramics and your experience in London inform your perspective
             on the cross-cultural fusion evident in your art?
             I actually began working with ceramics during my studies at UAL: Chelsea College of Arts. It is widely known that China
             has a rich tradition in ceramic art, and I believe this cultural affinity sparked my interest in historical Chinese ceramics
             from  a  young  age.  Coming  to  London  broadened  my  perspective;  the  museums  here  first  expanded  my  view  to
             encompass all of East Asia, where I found the ceramic arts of Korea and Japan both fascinating and familiar. Ultimately,
             this experience led to a broader interest in classical art from civilizations around the world. London's museums have
             provided me with a new perspective, showcasing classical art from different civilizations and eras, which has fostered a
             cross-cultural comparison in my mind. I hope to reflect this sense of cultural fusion and mutual influence in my work.
             How do you approach combining distinct traditions into a cohesive piece?
             My references to ancient Roman pottery primarily focus on materiality. I use a type of red clay commonly known as
             Terra-cotta, which was widely employed in ancient Greek and Roman cultures. Additionally, I aim to achieve the high-
             polished effect characteristic of ancient Roman red pottery (Terra sigillata). The shapes of my works draw inspiration
             from elements of Chinese culture, such as the Hill Censer from the Han Dynasty (starting in 202 BCE) and tripod pottery
             from China's Neolithic period.
             The use of Urushiol lacquer and polishing wax instead of traditional ceramic glazes is distinctive in your
             work. Could you share what motivated this choice and how it enhances your pieces?
             The  techniques  for  achieving  the  high-polished  effect  of  ancient  Roman  pottery  remain  a  mystery  to  me,  so  I  am
             exploring alternative methods to realize this effect, hoping to develop my unique working processes along the way. I was
             inspired by the technique of polishing marble tiles with wax, which led me to experiment with this material.
             Regarding Urushiol lacquer, its use originated from a suggestion by another artist, Xiaoyu Li (Sho-Woo Lee), who also
             provided  technical  support  for  this  body  of  work.  Urushiol  lacquer  is  a  traditional  natural  material  from  East  Asia,
             commonly referred to as Japanese lacquer, Korean lacquer, or Chinese lacquer. I prefer the term "Urushiol lacquer" for
             its  universality.  I  chose  this  material  to  reflect  my  respect  for  traditional  techniques  and  natural  materials,  and  its
             refined translucent amber color enhances the textures I create on the surface of the clay.



                                                           36
   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41